Here are some ideas that have been rolling around in my head lately:
Whatever we believe the Good News is, will be how we enact church. What this means is, the image of salvation that is at the core of our Christianity (forgiveness of sins, new creation, victory over sin, victory over oppressive powers) will directly influence our initiatives at church. We will interpret our role as a church in direct relation to how we believe God saves us in Jesus Christ. If we believe Jesus negotiates the legal transaction between God and us and the only requirement is to believe that, then we will spend our time trying to convince people to believe it. If we believe Jesus delivers us from the power of sin, then we will seek to deliver those bound by sin. If we believe Jesus offers us a new creation, then we will seek to initiate spiritual formation activities. If we believe Jesus overcomes the oppressive powers of this age, then we will seek those who are marginal and oppressed. Therefore, a healthy view of the church starts with a healthy view of salvation.
I believe the spirit of God lives among the people of God. Therefore, I also believe God’s preferred future for any particular church lives in the imagination of the people of God. Leadership, then, must create processes for that imagination to give birth to values and ministries. Moreover, the leadership must find ways of empowering and equipping the people of God to live into God’s future. There must be a balance between strategic planning on the leadership’s part and freedom for members to step out and engage in missional activities on their own. I also believe God is at work in the communities where we live, so leadership must also find ways of tapping into the imagination of the community.
Rather than trying to discover what kind of church our community would go to, we should try to discern what God is up to in our communities and join him in that. North American Christianity has turned consumeristic in many respects. The church will often see itself as mere vendors of religious goods and services. In an attempt at church growth the church will initiate programs they feel will attract outsiders. This views the guest as a mere consumer. I believe a more theologically sound approach is to engage our communities in missional activities and invite them to participate in the mission of God. Instead of asking our neighbors "What kind of church would you go to?" We could ask them "What would be evidence that God is working in this neighborhood?" This changes our orientation from “church builders for God” to “fellow travelers with God.” Rather than merely receiving what we have to offer, the community participates in what God is doing in this world. I am convinced this will go farther in forming disciples of Jesus, than trying to woo our community with the best programs. This doesn’t mean we don’t have programs, of course we do. But, we initiate programs because we believe it is what God is doing in our community, not because we believe it will attract the biggest crowds.
Is this not how we approach human nature and aspirational church teaching? We constantly tell people how horrible, rotten, depraved, and venomous humanity is and then say, "But, get out there and serve God and do some good." One rule of theological anthropology is: If you have a low view of humanity, then don't get upset when it lets you down. It's only doing what its nature demands. I'm convinced, however, that cynics are merely ticked off optimists. They have this view of the world and reality keeps drawing it down. That’s why they’re mad.
